Ridge Invitational Round 3 [ACORN WR v. Lakeland CK]

Ridge Invitational Round 3 [ACORN WR v. Lakeland CK]

Overview of the Round----------------------------------------------------

Aff was dbill$

Speech by speech comments---------------------------------------------- 

1AC- Darius—you have a good clear speaking voice! Very loud and clear. Next time, you should work on keeping your voice consistent. Your voice tends to fluctuate over time and you tend to lose stamina. Also, I realized that your first contention is ‘mobility’, which is also the name of your second contention…

1AC CX- Innocuous does not mean to ‘be selfish’—note that; it means that something is not harmful or offensive

1NC- Matthew you didn’t read an impact to your disad!

1NC CX- Asking ‘can you explain your arguments’ is a really bad question because it allows your opponent to clarify and elaborate their arguments during CX. You are literally just handing them another speech.

2AC- you didn’t stay on our roadmap! Try to stay on track next time.

2NC- Its ‘bay-ner’ not Boehner. Remember to pronounce it correctly to avert embarrassment next time. Also—careful with your CP text!

1NR-good explanation of the sacred cow link! however, both of you should learn how to split up the neg block. you guys literally just repeated each other!

1AR- I thought that your 1AR was good but there were too many conceded arguments because I realized that you didn’t flow.

2NR/2AR- I think that the 2NR did a better job explaining why the states would do the plan better.