Saturday, 26 January 2013

Beacon Round 3 BkTech v. Stuy


Judge Comments (Beacon Round 3 Brooklyn Tech v. Stuyvesant)

Speech by Speech comments

1AC- Temur—you are very fast for an novice but sometimes your speed causes you to stumble over words. Try to do some enunciation/pen drills! Also make sure you keep track of where you are on your speech doc! You keep on losing your place when you read your 1AC! However, I liked how your vocal inflection changes every time you read a tag! Made it easy for me to flow.
1AC CX- get to know your aff better! You couldn’t explain why not doing HSR collapses US competitiveness! Please look over your aff and be sure you can explain why congestion is bad and why competitiveness would collapse without HSR! Also, you said you solved for warming, but none of these arguments were made in the 1AC!
1NC—read the counterplan text first! Also, I don’t like the tag “extinction” it doesn’t tell much and is very vague. Also, Temur, its your CX—don’t let your partner dominate and ask ALL the questions!
1NC CX—Sophia—learn to answer CX questions more thoroughly!
2AC—Good coverage—however, try not to take almost 5 minutes of prep—if you have blocks to arguments, it shouldn’t take you that long because there were only two off case arguments and one argument on case. Also, you don’t have to explain a card right after you read it! However, GREAT LINE BY LINE and good analysis on case!
2NC-good explanation of the oil disad and I liked your 2NC overview on the Counterplan.
1NR- good job doing impact calculus comparing the warming impacts that the aff has and the sino us war that you guys are impacting!
1AR-
2NR- don’t read 50 state fiat good in the 2nr. if the argument wasn’t made earlier, I wouldn’t vote on it. Also, they didn’t read 50 state fiat bad so you don’t have to waste your time reading it. more analysis on how you link to your impact should be done.



General Comments


AFF—Please look over your aff and be sure you can explain why congestion is bad and why competitiveness would collapse without HSR! Also, you said you solved for warming, but none of these arguments were made in the 1AC!
NEG- you don’t have to say words like “link”, “impact”… Don’t like the ‘extinction’ tag
-        also, saying “US is the heg” doesn’t make sense; say US is a hegemon
-        the card you read in the 1NR that says there is no short term economic stimulus effect is talking about the EIS CP—doesn’t apply
-        even if we don’t fight over oil, we will probably be there—not reverse causual
-        1NR-stop saying ‘nuke war and extinction

Speaker points

-        Tina—28
-        Harith—28.5
-        Sophia 27.5
-        Temur-27